Application of SpyGlass peroral choledochoscopy to the diagnosis and treatment of biliary stricture after liver transplantation / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective:To explore the characteristics of biliary stricture after liver transplantation (LT) under SpyGlass peroral choledochoscopy and to investigate its treatment value for difficult stricture.Method:A total of 24 patients of biliary stricture after LT at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University underwent SpyGlass examination from January 2019 to December 2020, 15.5 months (2-58 months) after surgery. The characteristics of different types of strictures and the selective guidewire placement results by SpyGlass were recorded and analyzed.Results:Of the 24 patients, 9 were anastomostic strictures (AS) and 15 others were non-anastomostic strictures (NAS). The main characteristic of 5 initial AS patients was scar constriction. Whether treated or not, all of the 15 NAS patients showed evident inflammatory hyperplasia in hilar bile duct under SpyGlass, 80% (12/15) of which were accompanied with intrahepatic biliary stones. The strictures disappeared with mild hyperplasia in 8 patients (4 AS and 4 NAS) whose biliary stents were extracted. Eleven patients (5 AS and 6 NAS) needed guidwire placement under SpyGlass, six (54.5%) of whom succeeded. The successful rate in AS patients was higher than that of NAS (4/5 VS 2/6).Conclusion:The main characteristic of AS is scar constriction and that of NAS is inflammatory hyperplasia. Selective guidewire placement can be achieved by SpyGlass peroral choledochoscopy with a satisfactory successful rate in the difficult AS.

Coledocolitiasis y exploración laparoscópica dela vía biliar. Un estudio de cohorte / Choledocholithiasis and laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct. A cohort study

Introducción. La coledocolitiasis es la presencia de cálculos en las vías biliares. En la mayoría de los casos se trata mediante la colangio pancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica y menos comúnmente por intervención quirúrgica laparoscópica. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes sometidos a exploración laparoscópica de la vía biliar. Métodos. Se incluyeron pacientes intervenidos entre los años 2014 y 2018, en dos instituciones de nivel III en Cali, Colombia, referidos para valoración por cirugía hepatobiliar, por dificultad para la extracción de los cálculos por colangio pancreatografia retrograda endoscópica, debido al tamaño, la cantidad, o la dificultad para identificar o canular la papila duodenal. Resultados. De los 100 pacientes incluidos, se encontró que el 72 % fueron mujeres, con rango de edad entre 14 y 92 años. Al 39 % de los pacientes se les extrajo un solo cálculo y al 16 % 10 cálculos. Un 12 % presentaron cálculos gigantes (mayores de 2,5 cm de ancho) y un 44 % presentaron litiasis múltiple. Al 69 % de los pacientes se les realizó colecistectomía. El porcentaje de éxito de limpieza de la vía biliar por laparoscopia fue del 95 %.Discusión. La exploración laparoscópica de la vía biliar es una técnica posible, reproducible, segura y con excelentes resultados para el manejo de la coledocolitiasis

Introduction. Choledocholithiasis is the presence of stones in the bile ducts. In most cases it is treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography and less commonly by laparoscopic surgery. The objective of this study was to describe a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct.Methods. The study included patients operated between 2014 and 2018, in two level III institutions in Cali, Colombia, referred for evaluation for hepato-biliary surgery, due to difficulty in removing stones by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography cholangiography, due to the size, quantity, or difficulty of identifying or cannulating the duodenal papilla. Results. Out of the 100 patients included, it was found that 72% were women, with an age range between 14 and 92 years. A single stone was removed from 39% of patients and 10 stones from 16%; 12% had giant stones (greater than 2.5 cm wide), and 44% had multiple stones; 69% of the patients underwent cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic bile duct cleaning success rate was 95%. Discussion. Laparoscopic exploration of the bile duct is a possible, reproducible, and a safe technique with excellent results for the management of choledocholithiasis

Effectiveness and safety of two-step percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotomy in treatment of complex hepatolithiasis / 临床肝胆病杂志

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two-step percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotomy (PTCSL) in the treatment of complex hepatolithiasis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 118 patients with complex hepatolithiasis who were admitted to 3201 Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center from January 2018 to June 2020, and according to the surgical procedure, they were divided into PTCSL group with 60 patients and surgery group with 58 patients. All patients were followed up for half a year to 3 years via telephone and outpatient service. The two groups were compared in terms of general information, perioperative indicators (including time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, time to first flatus and time to first defecation after surgery, time to extraction of abdominal drainage tube, and length of hospital stay), changes in liver function and inflammatory indicators, postoperative complications (bile leakage, acute cholangitis, wound infection, and venous thrombosis of lower extremities), stone clearance rate and recurrence rate, and quality of life. The two-independent-samples t -test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups; the paired t -test was used for comparison between different periods of time within group; the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Results Compared with the surgery group, the PTCSL group had significantly shorter time of operation, time to first flatus and time to first defecation after surgery, and time to extraction of abdominal drainage tube, a significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, and a significantly shorter incision length (all P < 0.05). On day 1 after surgery, both groups had significant reductions in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ( P < 0.05) and a significant increase in white blood cell count (WBC) ( P < 0.05), and the PTCSL group had significantly lower levels of ALT, AST, and WBC than the surgery group (all P < 0.05). Compared with the surgery group, the PTCSL group had significantly lower incidence rates of postoperative bile leakage (5.0% vs 17.2%, P < 0.05), acute cholangitis (3.3% vs 13.8%, P < 0.05), wound infection (1.7% vs 10.3%, P < 0.05), and venous thrombosis of lower extremities (1.7% vs 12.1%, P < 0.05). Compared with the surgery group, the PTCSL group had a significantly higher stone clearance rate (58.3% vs 37.9%, P < 0.05) and a significantly lower long-term stone recurrence rate (10.0% vs 20.7%, P < 0.05). The PTCSL group had significantly higher quality of life scores than the surgery group (all P < 0.05). Conclusion For the treatment of complex hepatolithiasis, two-step PTCSL can effectively remove stones, with the advantages of fast postoperative recovery, low recurrence rate and incidence rate of complications, and high quality of life, and therefore, it is an effective alternative surgical procedure.

Application value of choledochoscopy and imaging examination in the diagnosis and treatment of residual bile duct stones / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the application value of choledochoscopy and imaging examination in the diagnosis and treatment of residual bile duct stones.Methods The retrospective descriptive study was conducted.The clinical data of 618 patients who underwent choledochoscopy and imaging examination after operation of hepatolithiasis in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between April 2014 and September 2018 were collected,including 300 males and 318 females,aged from 19 to 89 years,with an average age of (58 ± 12)years.Observation indicators:(1) situations of residual bile duct stones diagnosed by choledochoscopy and imaging examination;(2) stone extraction situations of patients with hepatolithiasis.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD,and measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Count data were represented as absolute number or percentage,and analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact propability.Results (1) Situations of residual bile duct stones diagnosed by choledochoscopy and imaging examination:all the 618 patients underwent choledochoscopy,and 505 of them underwent the imaging examination before choledochoscopy.① Of patients undergoing single imaging examination,72 received ultrasonography,with false-negative rate of 29.17％ (21/72);37 received CT examination,with false-negative rate of 10.81％(4/37);33 received T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 39.39％ (13/33).② Of patients undergoing combined two imaging examinations,61 received ultrasonography + CT,with false-negative rate of 8.20％ (5/61);129 received ultrasonography + T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 12.40％ (16/129);52 received CT + T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 5.77％(3/52).③ There were 121 receiving ultrasound+CT+T-tube cholangiography,with false-negative rate of 7.44％ (9/121).There were statistically significant differences in the false-negative rates of combined two or three examinations of ultrasound + CT+ T-tube cholangiography and single imaging examination (x2=40.83,P＜0.05).The further analysis showed a statistically significant difference among the single imaging examination (x2=7.70,P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference among the combined two of imaging examinations (x2=2.10,P＞0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the combined three examinations of ultrasound +CT+T-tube cholangiography and ultrasound and T-tube cholangiography examination respectively (x2=16.23,21.62,P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the combined three of imaging examinations and CT examination and combination of CT+T-tube cholangiography respectively (P＞ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the combined three of imaging examinations and combination of ultrasound+CT examinations and combination of ultrasound+T-tube cholangiography (x2=0.33,1.71,P＞0.05).Seventy-one patients without residual bile duct stone by preoperative imaging examination were detected residual bile duct stones by intraoperative choledochoscopy,and residual bile duct stones of 36,31 and 4 patients are respectively distributed around the distal common bile duct,small intrahepatic bile duct,left and right hepatic ducts,common hepatic duct and remaining common bile duct.(2) Stone extraction situations of patients with hepatolithiasis:of 618 patients,cases with 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10 times of residual bile duct stones clearance were respectively 392,116,48,39,9,6,3,2,2 and 1.Residual bile duct stones clearance frequency of patients was an average of 1.73 times.There were 63.43％(392/618) and 96.28％(595/618) of patients had stone clearance with once and ≤ 4 times of stone extraction,respectively.Conclusion The negative results of preoperative imaging examinations cannot be as standards of bile duct stone clearance before choledochoscopy,and the best choice is to detect whether there are residual bile duct stones and remove the stones combined with choledochoscopy.

Comparison of laparoscopic papillary dilation and Endoscopic sphincterotomy with small incision treating fine stones in common bile duct with stricture of oddi sphincter / 中国内镜杂志

Objective Analyze and compare the clinical data of patients with choledocholithiasis combined with benign biliary stricture and Oddi sphincter received laparoscopic percutaneous endoscopic dilation of duodenal papilla and endoscopic sphincterotomy, to explore the clinical experience and investigate the safety and superiority of laparoscopic papillary dilatation and the clinical value in extending the first phase suturing.. Methods From January 2016 to January 2017, 60 patients with choledocholithiasis combined with Oddi sphincter received laparoscopic nipple expansion (30 cases, Group L) and the others received endoscopic sphincterotomy (30 cases, Group E). All the patients clinical data was retrospectively compared and analyzed to explore the clinical experience. Results All operation were successfully performed with no perioperative deaths occurred.. By comparison of the clinical data before and after surgery, we learned that the changes of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), direct bilirubin and postoperative biliary tract bleeding has no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05), while the operation time, the changes of blood amylase and lipase, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, postoperative pancreatitis, gastrointestinal function recovery time has statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There has one self-healing bile leakage case in Group L thanks to routine placement of abdominal drainage tube intraoperatively. The patients gastrointestinal function recovered quick and not suffered pancreatitis because of there's no incision of nipple sphincter. Conclusion Laparoscopic papillary dilation reflects its superiority for not increase postoperative liver function damage, DBIL abnormalities, residual stones, biliary tract bleeding and biliary stricture, while can effectively decrease the incidence of complications such as postoperative pancreatitis, bile reflux and gastrointestinal symptoms. It is safe and effective with less postoperative complications in appropriately application in treatment of fine diameter common bile duct stones with sphincter of Oddi stenosis.

Comparison of laparoscopic papillary dilation and Endoscopic sphincterotomy with small incision treating fine stones in common bile duct with stricture of oddi sphincter / 中国内镜杂志

Objective Analyze and compare the clinical data of patients with choledocholithiasis combined with benign biliary stricture and Oddi sphincter received laparoscopic percutaneous endoscopic dilation of duodenal papilla and endoscopic sphincterotomy, to explore the clinical experience and investigate the safety and superiority of laparoscopic papillary dilatation and the clinical value in extending the first phase suturing.. Methods From January 2016 to January 2017, 60 patients with choledocholithiasis combined with Oddi sphincter received laparoscopic nipple expansion (30 cases, Group L) and the others received endoscopic sphincterotomy (30 cases, Group E). All the patients clinical data was retrospectively compared and analyzed to explore the clinical experience. Results All operation were successfully performed with no perioperative deaths occurred.. By comparison of the clinical data before and after surgery, we learned that the changes of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), direct bilirubin and postoperative biliary tract bleeding has no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05), while the operation time, the changes of blood amylase and lipase, postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, postoperative pancreatitis, gastrointestinal function recovery time has statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There has one self-healing bile leakage case in Group L thanks to routine placement of abdominal drainage tube intraoperatively. The patients gastrointestinal function recovered quick and not suffered pancreatitis because of there's no incision of nipple sphincter. Conclusion Laparoscopic papillary dilation reflects its superiority for not increase postoperative liver function damage, DBIL abnormalities, residual stones, biliary tract bleeding and biliary stricture, while can effectively decrease the incidence of complications such as postoperative pancreatitis, bile reflux and gastrointestinal symptoms. It is safe and effective with less postoperative complications in appropriately application in treatment of fine diameter common bile duct stones with sphincter of Oddi stenosis.

Use of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in repeat surgery for hepatolithiasis / 实用医学杂志

Objective To explore the clinical value of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in repeat surgery for hepatolithiasis. Methods The clinical data on 86 patients who had undergone repeat surgery for hepatolithiasis during January 2010 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. 36 patients received laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy(laparoscopy group),while 50 patients received laparotomy(laparotomy group). Surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative transfusion,stone clearance rates,length of postopera-tive hospital stay,and rate of complications were observed and analyzed. Results There were no significant differ-ences in surgical duration,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative transfusion,stone clearance rates,and rate of complications between the two groups(P>0.05). Length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group(P 0.05). Conclusions Use of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in repeat surgery for hepatolithiasis is safe and feasible and has a satisfactory efficacy.

Rigid choledochoscopy via biliary fistula tracts to remove bile duct stones / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To study the indications,feasibility and efficacy of rigid choledochoscopy via biliary fistula tracts to remove bile duct stones.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 86 patients with bile duct stones treated with rigid choledochoscopy via biliary fistula tracts at our hospital between November 2011 and July 2016.Patients with bile duct stones were divided into the percutaneous transhepatic cholangio drainage (PTCD) group and the T tube tract group.There were 40 patients who underwent lithotomy using rigid choledochoscopy via the PTCD tract and 46 patients who underwent choledocholithotomy using rigid choledochoscopy via the T-tube tract.A comparison was conducted to compare the duration of the procedures,the amount of perioperative bleeding,the postoperative complication rates and residual stone rates between the two groups.Results In the PTCD group,the average operation time was (77.0 ± 36.5) min,the amount of perioperative bleeding was (26.5 ± 54.1) ml,and the postoperative complication rate was 37.5 ％ (15/40).Complete lithotomy in one-stage was successful in 33 patients,and in two-stages in 1 patient.The residual stone rate was 15.0％ (6/40).In the T tube tract group,the average operation time was (82.5 ± 44.1) min,the amount of perioperative bleeding was (14.8 ± 21.0) ml,and the postoperative complication rate was 32.6％ (15/46).Complete lithotomy in one-stage was successful in 34 patients,and two-stages in 2 patients.The residual stone rate was 21.7％ (10/46).There were no significant differences in the residual stone rates,complication rates and operation time between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The amount of operative bleeding was significantly better in the T tube tract group than the PTCD group,(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions There was no significant differences in the clinical efficacy in the treatment of bile duct stones using choledochoscopy either via the PTCD tract or the T tube tract group.Both approaches can be used for bile duct stones.

Synchronous treatment of combined choledochoscopy, duodenoscopy and laparoscopy for management-failed biliary calculi / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To summarize the experience of applying choledochoscopy, duodenoscopy and laparoscopy, one-stage suturing of common bile duct, to treat cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis that failed to respond to ordinary endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of twenty-five pa-tients with choledocholithiasis complicated with cholecystolithiasis. 25 cases of failure to endoscopic stone extraction underwent LC and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary suture of (BD) from June 2013 to June 2015. Results One patient was converted to laparotomy with small incision. The other one had residual stones and therefore underwent a second EST. After the treatment, two patients developed hyperamylasemia, which was cured by conservative therapy; One patient had bile leakage, which was treated by percutaneous drainage with no serious complications and death. No long-term complication was found in a portion of patients followed up until now. Conclusion In properly selected patients of duodenoscopy management-failed, synchronous treatment of combined application of three endoscopies in laparoscopic surgery with primary suture of (BD) is feasible, effective and safe.

Comparison of two flushing suction methods in SpyGlass choledochoscopy system / 中华消化内镜杂志

Objective To evaluate the applicant effect of improved flushing suction method for SpyClass choledochoscope operation. Methods Seventy-three patients who underwent SpyGlass choledocho-scopy from February 2013 to January 2015 were enrolled. Negative pressure biopsy channel was used in group A(n= 34)during conducting SpyGlass choledochoscopy with the tube directly connected to the conveying pipe and combined with duodenoscope suction.In group B(n= 39),the biopsy channel of disposable syringe jacket was first connected to a delivery catheter,then the negative pressure pipe was put in the injector coat, combined with duodenoscope suction. Adverse reactions,theⅠ image acquisition time after the placement of SpyGlass delivery catheter to pancreaticobiliary duct,the total operation time,and the occurrence of compli-cations after operation were recorded. Results Sinus bradycardia,arrhythmia,agitation occurred in 7 cases (20. 6%),5 cases( 14. 7%),and 10 cases( 29. 4%) respectively in group A,those were 1 case (2. 6%),0 case(0/ 39),2 cases(5. 1%)respectively in group B with significant difference(P<0. 05). The time to acquire a clear image and the total operation time in group A were 6. 2 min and 24. 9 min,and 3. 3 min and 16. 8 minutes in B group with significant difference(P<0. 05),postoperative cholangitis oc-curred in 5 cases in group A(14. 7%),1 case(2. 6%)in group B with significant difference(P<0. 05). Conclusion New irrigation and suction method has obvious advantages in the SpyGlass system.

Clinical efficacy of combined three-endoscopic minimally invasive surgical treatment of extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis in 2 364 patients / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the indications and clinical efficacy of combined application of laparoscope,choledochoscope and duodenoscope in the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.Methods The retrospective cohort study was adopted.The chnical data of 2 364 patients with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis who were admitted to the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2008 to December 2015 were collected.Of the 2 364 patients,861 patients had cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct ≥ 8 mm,720 patients had cholecystolithiasis combine with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm,783 patients had only extarhepatic cholangiolithiasis.In the patients diagnosed as cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic changiolithiasis,laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) were applied to patients with the diameter of common bile duct≥8 mm,and the T-tube placement or primary suture was used intraoperatively according to the status of individualized patients;endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) + LC were applied to patients with the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm.For patients with only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy,EST or EPBD was applied,and LCBDE was applied to patients with multiple stones and maximum diameter ＞ 2 cm and unsuitable for EST or EPBD.If residual stones were found after operation in patients with T-tube placement,choledochoscope was used to extract stone;otherwise,EST or EPBD was used.Treatment outcomes including treatment method,success rate of minimally invasive lithotomy,operation time,incidence of complication,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses,and the results of follow-up including 1-,3-year recurrence rate of stones were recorded.The follow-up was done by outpatient examination and telephone interview till January 2016.All the patients were reexamined blood routine,liver function and color doppler ultrasonography of the abdomen at 1 month,3 months,6 months,1 year and 3 years after operation.Suspected residual cholangiolithiasis found by ultrasound was varified by computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonanced cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging examination.For patients with T-tube placement,CT scan and biliary photography were performed at 2-3 months postoperatively to determine whether residual stones existed and T tube could be pulled out.Measurement data were presented as mean (range).Results Of 2 364 patients,2 271 patients received minimally invasive lithotomy successfully.Of 861 patients of cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis and the diameter of common bile duct≥8 mm,836 succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 97.10％ (836/861),the other 25 patients were converted to open surgery.Seven hundred and three patients of 836 patients received T-tube placement in LCBDE,and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 97 minutes (range,41-167 minutes),3.70％ (26/703),6.7 days (range,3.0-32.0 days) and 3.4 × 104 yuan (range,1.5 × 104-6.7 × 104 yuan),respectively.One hundred and thirtythree patients of 836 patients received primary suture,and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 89 minutes (range,39-123 minutes),3.01％ (4/133),4.1 days (range,2.0-17.0 days),2.1 × 104 yuan (range,1.6 × 104-3.4 × 104 yuan),respectively.Of 720 patients with the diameter of common bile duct ＜ 8 mm who underwent EST or EPBD + LC,687 succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 95.42％ (687/720),the other 33 patients were converted to open surgery.The mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses of 687 patients were 101 minutes (range,69-163 minutes),2.91％ (20/687),5.6 days (range,2.0-15.0 days) and 2.8 × 104 yuan (range,2.0 × 104-6.4 × 104 yuan),respectively.In 783 patients with only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy,701 of 725 patients who were treated with EST or EPBD succeeded in minimally invasive lithotomy,with a success rate of 96.69％ (701/ 725),and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses of 701 patients were 47 minutes (range,11-79 minutes),2.28％ (16/701),3.7 days (range,2.0-19.0 days),1.7 × 104 yuan (range,1.3 × 104-5.5 × 104 yuan),respectively;47 of 58 patients who were treated with LCBDE succeeded in lithotomy,with a success rate of 81.03％ (47/58),and the mean operation time,incidence of complications,duration of postoperative hospital stay and treatment expenses were 124 minutes (range,94-170 minutes),8.51％ (4/47),7.9 days (range,5.0-21.0 days) and 3.8 × 104 yuan (range,2.3 × 104-7.9 × 104 yuan),respectively.Of 2 364 patients,2 207 were followed up for a mean time of 38 months (range,1-72 months).The 1-,3-year recurrence rates were 2.74％ (19/693) and 5.08％ (24/472) in patients receiving LC + LCBDE,3.10％ (21/677) and 5.69％ (30/527)in patients receiving EST or EPBD +LC for cholecystolithiasis combined with extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis.The 1-,3-year recurrence rates were 3.22％ (20/621) and 6.11％ (25/409) in patients receiving EST or EPBD + LC,7.32％ (3/41) and 11.11％(2/18) in patients receiving LCBDE for only extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis or recurrent stones after cholecystectomy.Conclusions It is safe and effective to treat extrahepatic cholangiolithiasis based on combined application of laparoscope,choledochoscope and duodenoscope,with choosing appropriate indications as the key to improve the therapeutic effect.Primary suture in the LCBDE is recommended because it can protect patients from T-tube placement.

Observation on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with polypoid lesions of gallbladder treated by ;laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy / 实用医学杂志

Objective To observe the effects of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of polypoid lesions of gallbladder and the effects on postoperative rehabilitation of patients. Methods 78 cases of patients with polypoid lesions of gallbladder treated in our hospital from August 2011 to November 2014 were selected as the study object. According to the order of medical treatment and hospital admission , the patients were numbered and randomly divided into laparoscopy group and combined group , with 39 cases in each group. The laparoscopy group were treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy while the combined group were treated by laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy gallbladder-protection surgery. The operation indicators , recovery of gastrointestinal function and incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups were observed. After discharge , the 2 groups of patients were followed up for 1 year. The improvement of postoperative digestive tract symptoms and rehabilitation of patients was observed. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative fasting time, defecation time and hospitalization time of the combined group [(20.13 ± 7.48) mL, (0.51 ± 0.98) d, (1.20 ± 0.84) d, (1.98 ± 1.54)d] were less than those of the laparoscopy group (P <0.05); The incidence rate of complications in the combined group (10.26%) was lower than that in the laparoscopy group (33.33%) (P < 0.05); Immediately at the end of operation and 1 week after operation, VAS scores of the combined group [(4.23 ± 0.41), (2.46 ± 0.17) ] were lower than those in the laparoscopy group (P < 0.05); At the last follow-up, KPS score of the combined group increased to (89.98 ± 1.24), which was higher than that in the laparoscopy group (P < 0.05); GradeⅠpostoperative recovery in the combined group accounted for 87.18% which was higher than that in the laparoscopy group (64.10%). There was no case of grade III and the proportion was lower than that in the laparoscopy group (15.38%). The differences in proportions of grade I and III between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion To adopt laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in the treatment of polypoid lesions of gallbladder , the curative effect is certain and the minimally invasive advantage is obvious. The long-term recovery effect is good and the safety is high.

Clinical effect of percutaneous transhepaticcholangioscopic lithotomy combined with rigid choledochoscopyin treatment of postoperative recurrent hepatolithiasis / 实用医学杂志

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of percutaneous transhepaticcholangioscopic lithotomy (PTCSL)combined with rigid cholangioscopy in treatment of recurrent hepatolithiasis. Methods Retrospective analysisof therapeutic result of 54 patientswith postoperative recurrent hepatolithiasisduring January 2012 to January 2015. Twenty eight cases were recruited as the observation group (PTCSL group). Twenty six cases were recruited as the control group (Laparotomy group). Following parameters were observed, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, clearance of stones and postoperative hospital stay. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss , clearanceof stones , and the postoperative hospital stay of the PTCSL group werebetter than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05). The number of patients with postoperative pain of the PTCSL group was significantly lower than in the laparotomygroup (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in other complication rates. There was no difference in terms of stone recurrence , incidence of cholangitis and intrahepatic biliary strictures recurrence ratebetween two groups in follow-up period. Conclusions PTCSL combined with rigid choledochoscopywas a safe and effectivemethod with minimal invasion formanagement of the postoperative recurrent hepatolithiasis. It could got a better resultsin the short-term outcomes.

Safe laparoscopic clearance of the common bile duct in emergently admitted patients with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Laparoscopic treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis is challenging due to mandatory recovery of the biliary drainage and clearance of the common bile duct (CBD). The aim of our study was to assess postoperative course of cholangitis and biliary sepsis after laparoscopic clearance of the CBD in emergently admitted patients with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. METHODS: Emergently admitted patients who underwent laparoscopic clearance of the CBD were included prospectively and stratified in 2 groups i.e., cholangitis positive (CH+) or negative (CH-) group. Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative imaging data, inflammatory response, surgical intervention, complication rate and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of a total 320 patients underwent laparoscopic clearance of the CBD, of which, 60 belonged to the acute cholangitis group (CH+) and 39 to the cholangitis negative group (CH-). Interventions were done on average 4 days after admission, operation duration was 95-105 min, and the conversion rate was 3-7% without differences in the groups. Preoperative inflammatory response was markedly higher in the CH+ group. Inflammation signs on intraoperative choledochoscopy were more evident in patients with cholangitis. Postoperative inflammatory response did not differ between the groups. The overall complication rate was 8.3% and 5.1%, respectively. Laparoscopic clearance of the CBD resulted in 1 lethal case (CH+ group), resulting in 1% mortality rate and a similar 12-month readmission rate. CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage laparoscopic intraoperative US and choledochoscopy-assisted clearance of the CBD is feasible in emergently admitted patients with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis.

Transcystic Choledochoscopy Combined with Holmium Laser for Choledocholithiasis:a Report of 16 Cases / 中国微创外科杂志

Objective To investigate the application value of transcystic choledochoscopy combined with holmium laser for common bile duct stones . Methods Clinical data of 16 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent transcystic choledochoscopy and holmium laser cholelithotripsy between March 2012 and December 2013 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed.During holmium laser cholelithotripsy (1.0 J/10 Hz, 400 μm fiber), the stones were fragmented under direct vision of choledochoscopy and were extracted by using water flushing or a stone basket . Results The stones were successfully removed in 15 patients, including 6 cases of laparoscopic operation and 9 cases of open operation .The operation time was (132 ±27) min for open surgery and (156 ±33) min for laparoscopic surgery .The stone fragment and removal time was (30.2 ±8.5) min for open surgery and (45.6 ±10.4) min for laparoscopic surgery .The hospital stay was (9.7 ±1.4) d.There was 1 case of failed cholelithotripsy due to obstructed water flow and blurry vision .Follow-up examinations in 14 cases for 2-24 months found no recurrence of stones or biliary strictures. Conclusion Transcystic choledochoscopy and holmium laser cholelithotripsy is intuitive , accurate, and effective, being a safe and reliable alternative for choledocholithiasis .

Comparison of efficacy between choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of gallstones: a meta-analysis / 临床肝胆病杂志

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy (CGPC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of gallstones. MethodsThe databases of CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to CGPC and LC in the treatment of gallstones published up to June 2015. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed for the literature included, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. ResultsFive RCTs involving 685 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that CGPC group and LC group had significant differences in operation time (OR=8.85, 95% CI: 049-17.21, P=0.04) and incidence of postoperative diarrhea (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.53, P=0.000 4). However, no significant differences were seen between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding volume (OR=-12.37, 95% CI: -29.73-4.99, P=016), time to postoperative intestinal function recovery (OR=-7.19, 95% CI: -24.28-9.90, P=0.41), hospitalization days (OR=-0.17, 95% CI: -1.98-1.63, P=0.85), and hospital costs (OR=-1.14, 95% CI: -2.57-0.28, P=0.12). ConclusionThe operation time and incidence of postoperative diarrhea in CGPC are superior to those in LC, while no significant differences are observed in intraoperative bleeding volume, time to postoperative intestinal function recovery, hospitalization days, and hospital costs. Due to a limited number of articles included and publication bias, RCTs with a large sample size and high quality are needed to provide more effective data.

Comparison of efficacy between choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of gallstones: a meta-analysis / 临床肝胆病杂志

ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of choledochoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholelithotomy (CGPC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the treatment of gallstones. MethodsThe databases of CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to CGPC and LC in the treatment of gallstones published up to June 2015. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed for the literature included, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis. ResultsFive RCTs involving 685 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that CGPC group and LC group had significant differences in operation time (OR=8.85, 95% CI: 049-17.21, P=0.04) and incidence of postoperative diarrhea (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.53, P=0.000 4). However, no significant differences were seen between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding volume (OR=-12.37, 95% CI: -29.73-4.99, P=016), time to postoperative intestinal function recovery (OR=-7.19, 95% CI: -24.28-9.90, P=0.41), hospitalization days (OR=-0.17, 95% CI: -1.98-1.63, P=0.85), and hospital costs (OR=-1.14, 95% CI: -2.57-0.28, P=0.12). ConclusionThe operation time and incidence of postoperative diarrhea in CGPC are superior to those in LC, while no significant differences are observed in intraoperative bleeding volume, time to postoperative intestinal function recovery, hospitalization days, and hospital costs. Due to a limited number of articles included and publication bias, RCTs with a large sample size and high quality are needed to provide more effective data.

MRI to compare the long-term outcomes of partial hepatectomy versus choledocholithotomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To compare the long-term outcomes of partial hepatectomy versus choledocholithotomy both combined with choledochoscopy,for the treatment of hepatolithiasis.Methods Patients who underwent either type of the operations were followed up and examined using hepatobiliary magnetic resonance (enhanced MRI + MRCP).The incidences of abnormal imaging in the two groups were compared.Results Of 268 patients,138 patients underwent partial hepatectomy and the remaining 130 patients underwent choledocholithotomy.When hepatectomy was compared with choledocholithotomy,the recurrence rate of acute cholangitis combined with bile duct stone (5.8％ vs.21.5％),the reoperation rate (5.8％ vs.21.5％),the bile duct stricture rate (8.0％ vs.44.6％),the abnormal liver parenchyma perfusion rate (4.3％ vs.23.1％),the incidence of intrahepatic bile duct enhancement or thickening (1.5％ vs.26.9％),the incidence of hepatic atrophy (3.0％ vs.30.0％) and the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma (0 vs.2.3％) were better.Conclusions The long-term adverse outcomes were significantly worse in the choledocholithotomy group than in the partial hepatectomy group.Choledocholithotomy combined with choledochoscopy should only be considered as a complementary procedure to partial hepatectomy in hepatolithiasis.

Strategy of laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy for the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis / 中华消化外科杂志

Cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis is a common disease.The typical open surgery is challenged by the minimally invasive surgery recently.The minimally invasive surgery combined with laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy has been accepted widely through analyzing and summarizing comprehensively the current situation of the minimally invasive surgery for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) +endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) or endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) should be chosen primarily for the patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis and without common bile duct dilatation (common bile duct diameter ＜0.8 cm),and LC + laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration and lithotomy are used under favorable conditions.LC + choledocholithotomy or T tube drainage should be chosen primarily for the patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis and common bile duct dilatation (common bile duct diameter ＞ 0.8 cm).Primary suture of common bile duct should be used with removal of the common bile duct stones,patency of distal common bile duct and recovery function of sphincter of Oddi.The minimally invasive surgery combined with laparoscopy and choledochoscopy or duodenoscopy which is selected reasonably could improve the treatment of cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis and reduce the complications,with a significant clinical efficacy.